<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The only headhunter on Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://corcodilos.com/blog/1164/the-only-headhunter-on-google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://corcodilos.com/blog/1164/the-only-headhunter-on-google</link>
	<description>The insider&#039;s edge on job search &#38; hiring™ &#124; Copyright © 2011 North Bridge Group, Inc. All rights reserved.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:42:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheyney</title>
		<link>http://corcodilos.com/blog/1164/the-only-headhunter-on-google/comment-page-1#comment-27068</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheyney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corcodilos.com/blog/?p=1164#comment-27068</guid>
		<description>Hi Nick.
um... JB King is kinda correct.

&quot;Where&quot; the searcher is located has a lot to do with the results Google shows.

I am in Australia and you do not appear on page one of my listings. You appear as the second (non-paid) listing on page two of the results.  Fastcompany.com is number one on page two.

Sorry to burst your bubble there.

Love your work anyway.  I have spent the last two days destroying my resume to build a &#039;working resume&#039;.

Thanks for all the advice.

Cheyney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nick.<br />
um&#8230; JB King is kinda correct.</p>
<p>&#8220;Where&#8221; the searcher is located has a lot to do with the results Google shows.</p>
<p>I am in Australia and you do not appear on page one of my listings. You appear as the second (non-paid) listing on page two of the results.  Fastcompany.com is number one on page two.</p>
<p>Sorry to burst your bubble there.</p>
<p>Love your work anyway.  I have spent the last two days destroying my resume to build a &#8216;working resume&#8217;.</p>
<p>Thanks for all the advice.</p>
<p>Cheyney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paige Breen</title>
		<link>http://corcodilos.com/blog/1164/the-only-headhunter-on-google/comment-page-1#comment-23383</link>
		<dc:creator>Paige Breen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corcodilos.com/blog/?p=1164#comment-23383</guid>
		<description>Hiya Nick

I have been following you for my whole career, from junior recruiter to now owning and running a successful Recruitment / Search firm.  I often refer people I am working with to your site for guidance since it is so empowering.

In relation to the term &quot;Headhunter&quot; I know in Australia it has become cheapened by a lot of wannabe firms pitching themselves as search specialists in the late 90&#039;s and earlier this decade.  These sharks - big on promise, short on delivery - have eroded confidence in the entire retained search model and made headhunter a dirty word out here.

I&#039;m sick of all the euphemisms...and I don&#039;t believe the contingent recruitment model is sustainable for specialist or senior recruitment. Contingent recruitment is a mugs game and allows the lowest common denominator to set the tone for the industry. Let&#039;s be proud of being headhunters.

Thanks for being the only headhunter on Google though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Nick</p>
<p>I have been following you for my whole career, from junior recruiter to now owning and running a successful Recruitment / Search firm.  I often refer people I am working with to your site for guidance since it is so empowering.</p>
<p>In relation to the term &#8220;Headhunter&#8221; I know in Australia it has become cheapened by a lot of wannabe firms pitching themselves as search specialists in the late 90&#8242;s and earlier this decade.  These sharks &#8211; big on promise, short on delivery &#8211; have eroded confidence in the entire retained search model and made headhunter a dirty word out here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sick of all the euphemisms&#8230;and I don&#8217;t believe the contingent recruitment model is sustainable for specialist or senior recruitment. Contingent recruitment is a mugs game and allows the lowest common denominator to set the tone for the industry. Let&#8217;s be proud of being headhunters.</p>
<p>Thanks for being the only headhunter on Google though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Corcodilos</title>
		<link>http://corcodilos.com/blog/1164/the-only-headhunter-on-google/comment-page-1#comment-23153</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Corcodilos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corcodilos.com/blog/?p=1164#comment-23153</guid>
		<description>@JB King: Doesn&#039;t seem to matter which PC you search on. I&#039;m referring to Google&#039;s web search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JB King: Doesn&#8217;t seem to matter which PC you search on. I&#8217;m referring to Google&#8217;s web search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB King</title>
		<link>http://corcodilos.com/blog/1164/the-only-headhunter-on-google/comment-page-1#comment-23152</link>
		<dc:creator>JB King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corcodilos.com/blog/?p=1164#comment-23152</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious if you tried this on a PC that hasn&#039;t gone to your blog would the results still be the same as you coming from a machine that has already made multiple visits to this site.  I&#039;m asking because I&#039;m noticing how the top 4 listed in the graphic all show 2-3 visits to the sites so the results may be different than if say I googled &quot;headhunter&quot; here.  For example, if I who is in Canada google &quot;headhunter,&quot; I don&#039;t get your blog coming up in the first page of results and I read your blog regularly.  Though if I google &quot;ask headhunter&quot; then I get a few different sites about you, or an Amazon.com link to your book, etc.  I just wanted to point that out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious if you tried this on a PC that hasn&#8217;t gone to your blog would the results still be the same as you coming from a machine that has already made multiple visits to this site.  I&#8217;m asking because I&#8217;m noticing how the top 4 listed in the graphic all show 2-3 visits to the sites so the results may be different than if say I googled &#8220;headhunter&#8221; here.  For example, if I who is in Canada google &#8220;headhunter,&#8221; I don&#8217;t get your blog coming up in the first page of results and I read your blog regularly.  Though if I google &#8220;ask headhunter&#8221; then I get a few different sites about you, or an Amazon.com link to your book, etc.  I just wanted to point that out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GL Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://corcodilos.com/blog/1164/the-only-headhunter-on-google/comment-page-1#comment-23148</link>
		<dc:creator>GL Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://corcodilos.com/blog/?p=1164#comment-23148</guid>
		<description>Not to burst your bubble, Nick...but EVERYONE knew this.  Still, glad to see you at the top where you rightfully belong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to burst your bubble, Nick&#8230;but EVERYONE knew this.  Still, glad to see you at the top where you rightfully belong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

