What tipped me off was his constant obsession about the importance of being a worker who was in synch with the employer and was a person with a history of stayaing with employers over long periods.

Harrison Barnes talks alot about his days as an asphault contractor in Detroit. He seems to really love that part of his life. Great.

But in all of his writings Mr. Barnes admits that he could not hold down a job beyond his passion for asphault contracting. No college jobs. Lived away from people in law school. Fired from his position as a legal clerk in Michigan. Tossed aaround between law firms in LA.

Now A. Harrison Barnes offers his insight as to what constitutes a successful employee at the same time that he can’t keep his own businesses intact and those who weren’t fired decided to abandon his insane business concepts.

A. Harrison Barnes is a fraud with no practical experience. He has been terminated every time he was an employee. Please do not be hoodwinked by the fact that A. Harrison Barnes is now trying to rip off people by offering a “career course.”

At its core, A. Harrison Barnes (and his wife Claudia Barnes) always tried to blame his business failures upon those who failed him in his employment and hiring decisions.

The past few weeks prove the truth. The person responsible for most of A. Harrison Barnes’ profits, Daniel Binstock (who was also the best man when A. Harrison Barnes married the unsuspecting Claudia), left the company. He also left A. Harrison Barnes without a key cash flow.

His next defectors included the entire NY office of Carey and Danice. They decided that life under A. Harrison Barnes was too bizarre and corrupt to continue.

Bravo to Binstock, Danice and Carey. May you all prosper despite the automatic negativeness that might emerge only because you worked for BCG and A. Harrison Barnes.

On March 27, 2010 Jeter wrote:
What are you talking about Harrison. Your attempts to rewrite your history are sick. That furniture store? Well maybe they were cold to you because your behavior once forced them to file a restraining order against yesterday. And give up on saying that you were a student lon company. You were a two bit middleman who used his database of students to generate leads for real finance companies. Your employees left? Well, usually you fire them but most others don’t stay becauase they can’t stand working for a person and a place that is insane. Those commission people that stuck around after you forced most of them to resign? They are a group of people who either have significant others supporting them so they don’t have to quit, they are able to run side businesses to support their income or at least one can’t gert a job because he was disbarred from CA.

No wonder why your own resume includes the inability to hold a job for any length of time. Only this week you told us bout quitting the job with the job, ten going to Quinn. And in the past you wrote about having to “leave” Quinn (which was so great that they made a partner out of a person who acheived his status as a drubk person who sleeps in dumpsters), then went to Dewey (or some other firm), was probably fired from them and couldn’t get your job back anyplace else. Now you sit back and pretend to be some great owner of companies with keen insight as to how to manage careers.

How does Harrison Barnes respond to adversity? He lies about events and makes up stories about his achievements. What a disgrace.

http://www.ripoffreport.com/attorneys-legal-services/legal-authority/legal-authority-a-harrison-ba-573p4.htm

Looks like the rumors about outsourcing all operations to India are true. What a joke. Like I would ever trust a U.S. emloyment company based in India. I mean, in this economy I’m not even sure if I would trust one based in Canada.

http://www.ripoffreport.com/employment-services/bcg-attorney-search/bcg-attorney-search-and-affili-a7g3b.htm

Full story is here
http://blog.jobshouts.com/2010/01/07/hound-com-is-a-scam/

The FTC today finally ruled that blogsters who are paid to post reviews on products or services must now disclose the fact they were paid or face penalties up to $11,000 per infraction. This action by the FTC formalizes its long-standing belief that a lack of such disclosure violates consumer protection laws because such blog comments amount to undisclosed paid endorsements amounting to fraudulent and deceptive advertising.

The first indication that A. Harrison Barnes either paid people to post positive comments about his companies or asked people to post positive comments even if they were unfamiliar with the service first surfaced in 2008 in a blog posting by Cathy Gellis who confirmed that Mr. Barnes manipulated Amazon’s mTurk service to enlist individuals to “plant” false positive comments about Barnes’s companies. Ms. Gellis worked with Amazon to effectively bar Barnes from further use of mTurk. Since that time, scores of other similar incidents appeared on other websites.

In response to having been caught in his deceptive practices, A. Harrison Barnes then launched a virtual carbon copy of mTurk called Shorttask and used this site to pay thousands of people to plant comments and links that would make his companies appear to be much more effective, positive and favorable than the general view of other more reputable sites. Shorttask has been widely criticized as a deceptive and manipulative tactic to counter the rising tide of complaints against both he and his companies. (It should be noted that during the same period Barnes decided to sue individuals who posted negative comments about both he and his companies claiming $10 million in damages).

The latest move by the FTC merely formalizes what people have long known – that A. Harrison Barnes is willing to engage in questionabe, and probably illegal, consumer tactics to mislead the public as to the nature and poor quality of his companies and their services.

NYT Article: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/10/05/technology/AP-US-TEC-Bloggers-FTC.html

FTC Statement: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/10/endortest.shtm

It astounds me that you continue to write your blog with such blatantly dull and bizarre stories. I have tried to comment a few times but you seem to block anything critical of you or your musings. That’s OK. It’s your blog.

But yesterday, 8/25/09 was a “Barnes-burner.” Your laments about some beautiful and well-accomplished girl in your early school was incredulous. You said that she was a black belt and then said that she viciously attacked a fellow classmate merely because she called her a whore.

As a student of martial arts I know that your story is bull. A highly ranked martial artist is trained to understand that they are bestowed with a potentially lethal weapon and force should be used only when necessary. A true black-belt would not have have knocked out someone’s teeth because of a mere insult and lacking a need for physical self-defense. Your BS is piling so high that people need neoprene wayfarers to stay above the manure. Then you conclude that you knew that the allegations weren’t true because you knew of her every activity outside of class (even if you limited it to a lone reference to her martial arts class attendance).

Your diatribe did give insight into why you are lashing out at your critics. Somewhere in your childhood you seemed to have learned that tirades earned you better results as opposed to stoicism and renewed focus on tolerance and self-improvement. It seems that you view the law and lawsuits as your personal version of a misused black-belt. Just plain pathetic.

One last point. Please stop your constant referrals to women as either physically pretty or hot or ugly or fat as though that has any relevance to your theme. It is gross and insulting although your beauty and appearance fixations speak volumes of your character.

Do us all a favor and aspire to something better.

Thank you for your time.

BBR